Why Your Solar PV System Is Underperforming: The Impact of Shading on Solar ROI
- An Sheng
- Jan 5
- 3 min read
You may have seen it in your solar proposal:
“Return on investment in 2–3 years.”
On paper, it looks compelling. In reality, many system owners later ask us the same question:
“Why isn’t my system producing what we were promised?”
Bills are lower — but not by as much as expected.
Production graphs fall short of projections.
And the ROI timeline quietly stretches from years into many more years.
In most cases, the issue is not the panels, the inverter, or even the weather.
It’s shading.
Shading: The Most Common (and Costly) Oversight in Solar Design
Shading is one of the single biggest factors affecting solar performance — and yet, it is often underestimated or oversimplified during the proposal stage.
Even partial shading can significantly reduce energy output. When left unaddressed, it directly impacts:
Annual energy yield
Bill savings
ROI accuracy
Long-term system performance
This is why at Stellar Industries, shading assessment is never treated as a checkbox exercise. It is a core part of responsible system design.
Why Shading Has a Bigger Impact Than Most People Expect
Solar panels do not operate in isolation. They are connected electrically in strings, meaning the performance of one panel can affect others within the same circuit.
This means:
A small shadow can cause disproportionately large losses
Production loss is often non-linear
Losses repeat every day, every year — quietly eroding ROI
Even with Tier-1 panels and premium inverters, poor shading assessment can undermine the entire investment.
Roof Orientation: The Starting Point (Not the Conclusion)
Before evaluating shading, the first step is understanding roof orientation.
A simple way to assess this is by using satellite imagery (e.g. Google Maps) to observe roof direction and surrounding structures.
Example: Stellar Industries’ Rooftop
From satellite imagery, this roof is oriented north-west and south-east, which is generally favourable for solar production in Singapore.

However, orientation alone does not guarantee performance.
The sun’s movement — and how shadows interact with the roof throughout the day — is where real performance differences emerge.
Understanding the Sun’s Path in Singapore
The sun follows a path along the equator, rising in the east and setting in the west, with seasonal shifts north and south.
Because Singapore sits slightly north of the equator, this has practical implications for solar design.
South-Facing Roofs
South-facing arrays typically:
Receive the most consistent sunlight throughout the year
Perform strongly during midday, when solar irradiance peaks
Deliver the highest annual energy yield
For this reason, south-facing roofs are often prioritised where feasible.
East- and West-Facing Roofs
East- and west-facing roofs:
Receive sunlight for only part of the day
Peak in the morning (east) or afternoon (west)
Generally produces less total annual energy
These orientations can still be commercially viable — but only when shading is carefully analysed and system expectations are set correctly.
Common Sources of Shading We See on Rooftops
In real-world projects, shading most often comes from:
Adjacent buildings (existing or future developments)
Parapet walls
Rooftop equipment (water tanks, HVAC units, vents)
Trees
Lift overruns or antennas
Some shadows appear only at specific sun angles, making them easy to miss without proper modelling. Others move slowly across the roof, affecting production daily without being visually obvious.
Can Technology Solve Shading Issues?
Technology can reduce shading losses, but it cannot correct poor design assumptions.
Common mitigation tools include:
Panel Optimisers
Operate at panel level
Reduce mismatch losses under partial shading
Helpful, but not a substitute for good layout planning
Microinverters
Each panel operates independently
Shading on one panel does not affect others
Effective for complex roofs, with higher upfront cost
Smart String Configuration
Panels grouped based on similar shading behaviour
Minimises losses without additional hardware
Requires experienced system engineering
These tools improve outcomes, but they do not eliminate shading losses entirely. The most effective strategy is always avoiding shade wherever possible.
The Right Question to Ask Before You Install Solar
Instead of asking:
“How fast is my ROI?”
A better question is:
“How was shading assessed, and how conservative are the assumptions?”
A credible solar proposal should:
Include shading analysis — not just system size
Explain orientation trade-offs clearly
Avoid overly aggressive ROI claims
Be designed specifically for your site, not industry averages
Stellar’s Perspective
Solar is not a short-term product. It is long-term infrastructure.
When designed properly, a solar PV system should:
Perform predictably for 25+ years
Deliver stable savings year after year
Meet expectations set at the proposal stage
When systems underperform, the issue is rarely the sun.
More often, it is:
Shading that was underestimated
Orientation that was oversimplified
Design decisions driven by headline ROI instead of real-world conditions
At Stellar, we believe doing solar right means designing for reality — not best-case scenarios.
Because in the long run, honest assumptions outperform optimistic promises.




Comments